How to read this page.
- Built and tested2
Working in FaWCOS today, with tests or documents behind it.
- In progress8
Partly built. What remains is stated in each row.
- Planned15
Designed, not built yet. We will not describe these as met until they are.
- Watching5
Moving standards and policies we track before building against them.
Our rule: we say FaWCOS meets a standard only when it is built and tested. Everything else is designed to align or working towards.
Built and tested
Working in FaWCOS today, with tests or documents behind it.
-
NIST SP 800-63 and eIDAS levels of assurance
How confident an identity or record check is
Identity, Land and Activity are each levelled 0 to 3 from field evidence, with tiers from Registered to Audited. The rules are covered by automated tests.
-
FAO Voluntary Guidelines on Tenure (VGGT), ISO 19152 (LADM), STDM
Recording land rights, including customary tenure
Every walked boundary records how the land is held (customary, family, leased, sharecropped, communal and more) and who holds the right.
In progress
Partly built. What remains is stated in each row.
-
Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and GAID 2025
Consent, data subject rights and protection of personal data
Consent records, append-only access logs and protected national ID handling are built. A data protection impact assessment and registration with the NDPC are under way.
-
NIN verification through a licensed provider
A farmer’s legal identity
Built: lookup, the farmer confirms it is them, and one account per NIN. The raw NIN is never stored on phones. Being switched on for the pilot.
-
W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0
Portable, signed proof that others can check
Field evidence is already signed on the phone. Issuing attestations as verifiable credentials is being built.
-
FaWCOS Verification Standard v0.1
Our own rules for levels, evidence, audits and governance
Drafted, and the rules engine implements it. To be calibrated with pilot data before version 1.0.
-
EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)
Plot location data for commodities exported to the EU
Farm boundaries are walked and measured. An export in the EU due-diligence format and a deforestation cut-off check are planned.
-
UN Transparency Protocol (UNTP)
Digital product passports and traceability credentials
Built on the same credential basis as FaWCOS attestations. A passport per produce lot comes after attestations.
-
CAADP Kampala Declaration (2026 to 2035)
Africa’s agri-food targets for the decade
Verified farmer and land data supports its monitoring. Mapping FaWCOS outputs to its indicators is next.
-
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Targets 1.4, 2.3, 2.4, 5.a, 8.10, 13.2, 15.1, 16.9 and 17.18
Identity (16.9), land tenure (1.4, 5.a) and verified production (2.3) are captured. A full impact map is being written.
Planned
Designed, not built yet. We will not describe these as met until they are.
-
National Digital Farmers Registry (FMAFS)
Nigeria’s national farmer identity
Designed to link through a protected NIN reference, subject to agreement with the Registry.
-
DCI Farmer Registry Standards
Registry data and interoperability
Our data model is close; a published field mapping is next.
-
ISEAL Code of Good Practice
Credibility of verification systems
Impartiality is built in: organisations cannot clear flags on their own farmers. Independent governance is planned.
-
ISO/IEC 17029 and ISO 19011
Verification and audit practice
Audit records exist. A written audit procedure and auditor training are planned.
-
IPCC 2006 Guidelines and 2019 Refinement
How farm emissions are estimated
Capturing the practice detail emission estimates need, such as fertiliser, tillage and residue burning.
-
GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard
Land emissions in buyers’ supply chains
Verified parcels provide the traceability it asks for; a supplier-level report is planned.
-
IFRS S2
Climate disclosure by listed companies and banks
A portfolio and supplier emissions report is planned.
-
ISO 14064
Greenhouse gas calculation and verification
Report formats will follow it.
-
GS1 identifiers (GLN, GTIN)
Unique codes for farms, sites and produce lots
Farms and parcels have internal identifiers; GS1 codes are planned.
-
GS1 EPCIS 2.0
Harvest, aggregation and shipment events
Harvests are recorded; an event log in EPCIS form is planned.
-
ISO 22095, ISO 22005 and Codex CXG 60-2006
Chain of custody and food traceability
A custody model per buyer programme is planned.
-
AfCFTA rules of origin and SPS annex
Proving African origin and plant health for trade
Verified farm-level origin exists; an origin evidence pack is planned.
-
AfCFTA Digital Trade Protocol
Electronic trade documents and data flows
Open formats are used throughout so records can move across borders.
-
NAQS, SON and NAFDAC requirements
Nigerian export and quality clearance
Mapping which records each certificate needs.
-
Standards Organisation of Nigeria, then ARSO
Route to a national, then continental, standard
After the pilot, version 1.0 of the Verification Standard will be proposed.
Watching
Moving standards and policies we track before building against them.
-
Verra VM0042 and Gold Standard soil carbon
Carbon credits from improved land management
FaWCOS would supply verified farm data to a project developer. We do not promise farmers carbon income.
-
Paris Agreement Article 6.4
The UN crediting mechanism
Tracking agriculture methodologies as they are approved.
-
Nigeria National Carbon Market Framework
National authorisation of carbon credits
Tracking how agricultural data sources will be recognised.
-
GLOBALG.A.P., Rainforest Alliance and Fairtrade
Certification buyers already require
FaWCOS is designed to supply data to these schemes, not to replace them.
-
AU Data Policy Framework and Malabo Convention
Cross-border data norms in Africa
To be reviewed before any deployment outside Nigeria.
What is already running underneath.
- Field evidence is signed on the phone and chained, so changes after capture are detectable.
- A photo counts only after its file reaches the server and matches the fingerprint taken at capture.
- Levels are computed by fixed rules; nobody types them in.
- Flags are cleared only by the FaWCOS review team, with written reasons and a full decision history.
- Banks and insurers receive consented attestations, never raw farmer records.
A note on what this page is not.
This page describes how FaWCOS is designed and built. It is not a certification. No standards body named here has reviewed or endorsed FaWCOS, and the names are used only to say which standard a design follows.
Want the detail behind a row?
Ask for the FaWCOS Verification Standard v0.1, or for the evidence behind any line on this page.